SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cabelguenne, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vermeulen, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cabelguenne, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vermeulen, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Impact of centralization of cytotoxic drug preparations

Delphine Cabelguenne, PhD

Pharmacy Department Alain Nageotte, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

Christine Pivot-Dumarest, PhD

Pharmacy Department Alain Nageotte, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

Eliane Vermeulen, PhD

Ernst Young Santé, Villeur banne, France

Two types of circuits of injectable cytotoxic drugs still exist in our hospital: one with pharmaceutical centralization of the preparation and the other without. Our goal is to evaluate each circuit from two points of view: quality of patient care and protection of persons handling cytotoxics. For this evaluation, an original assessment was performed before and after centralization in the same pilot health care unit (two periods of 6 weeks each). To evaluate the prescription-preparation-administration process, six checklists consisting as a whole of 158 observable criteria have been constructed. These criteria have been weighted according to the risk of compromising the quality of patient care and the safety of persons. A total of 117 processes have been observed before centralization; after centralization, 91 were observed. From a qualitative viewpoint, we show that the cost of drugs stocked in the medicine chest of the health care unit has been reduced by 80%, that the flow of information between the different participants in the circuit varied, and that two types of dysfunctions exist: organizational and relational. From a quantitative viewpoint, we demonstrated that pharmaceutical intervention improves the quality of patient care (x2 test, P < 0.001) and reinforces the protection of manipulators (x2 test, P < 0.001). Pharmaceutical centralization of the preparation of cytotoxic drugs increases the efficiency of the circuit, from the prescription to administration.

Key Words: Assessment • cytotoxic drugs • quality of patient care • pharmaceutical centralization

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 5, No. 2, 87-102 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/107815529900500205


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement