SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dobish, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lee Gordon, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dobish, R.
Right arrow Articles by Lee Gordon, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Benchmarking pharmaceutical care within the Alberta Cancer Board

Roxanne Dobish, BScPharm

Cross Cancer Institute, Alberta Cancer Board Pharmacy

H. Lee Gordon, BScPharm

Lethbridge Cancer Clinic, Alberta Cancer Board Pharmacy, Alberta, Canada

Objective. To describe the numerous pharmacy ac tivities afforded by the seven pharmacy sites that provide various levels of pharmacy services to cancer patients in cities throughout Alberta, Canada.

Methods. A questionnaire for measuring phar maceutical care (PC) was developed and applied to each site to benchmark the level of PC that was offered at each institution. The survey was con structed based on elements of the PC model of Hepler and Strand et al and grouped along the lines of Cal Knowlton's ABCs of PC. Responses were graded according to what degree the site had fully, partially, or not yet incorporated the element surveyed.

Results. Overall, 44% of the PC elements were fully implemented, 33% were partially implemented, and 23% were not yet implemented in the newly formed Alberta Cancer Board Pharmacy Department. The traditional areas of bottling and counseling con tinue to be areas of strength, with 79% and 77% of the elements fully implemented, respectively. More em phasis is warranted in the areas of assessment and surveillance, with only 26% and 29% of the elements fully implemented, respectively.

Conclusions. The results of the survey indicate the need for continued planning to incorporate some of the elements of cognitive pharmacy services in the Alberta Cancer Board Pharmacy Department strategic plan.

Key Words: Pharmaceuticai care • benchmarking; amalgamation.

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 4, No. 4, 214-217 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/107815529800400413


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement