SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
1078155208101097v1
15/3/157    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bigelow, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, C. R
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bigelow, S.
Right arrow Articles by Chambers, C. R
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Antineoplastic agent workplace contamination study: the Alberta Cancer Board Pharmacy perspective Phase III

Susan Bigelow

Tom Baker Cancer Center Site, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, susanbig{at}cancerboard.ab.ca

Heidi Schulz, CPhT

Cross Cancer Institute Site, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Roxanne Dobish, BSc (Pharm)

Cross Cancer Institute Site, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Carole R Chambers, BSc (Pharm) MBA

Alberta Cancer Board Pharmacy Department, Calgary/Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Objective. To continue with workplace contamination monitoring in the Alberta Cancer Board (ACB) pharmacy practice environment.

Setting. The ACB in the Canadian province of Alberta which includes two public tertiary centers and 19 associated community satellite sites based around the province in existing hospitals.

Methods. After the completion of a Phase 1 and Phase 11 study,1 which investigated the feasibility of routine monitoring of antineoplastic agent contamination in the pharmacy practice environment, it was decided to launch a Phase III study. The Phase III study would be done at the Cross Cancer Institute in the main pharmacy department as well as at a brand new satellite pharmacy within the CCI hospital. Samples would be taken in these areas as well as on the outer exterior of latex gloves worn to prepare cyclophosphamide and other antineoplastics.

Results. The result determined that the area in front of the biological safety cabinet in the main CCI pharmacy department as well as the exterior of the latex gloves showed evidence of cyclophosphamide contamination. The results from the sample taken in the new satellite pharmacy showed no evidence of cyclophosphamide contamination.

Conclusion. Results from this study prompted a decision to launch a Phase IV study to determine the feasibility within our network, for routine monitoring as well as sampling throughout the clean room beyond the BSC.

Key Words: tertiary site • cytotoxic agent • workplace contamination • cyclophosphamide • routine monitoring

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 15, No. 3, 157-160 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1078155208101097


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement