SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sassi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Merlo, U. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sassi, G.
Right arrow Articles by Merlo, U. A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A reporting system for the assessment of chemotherapy toxicity

Graziella Sassi, PharmD

A.S.L.1 Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy

Barbara Striano, PharmD

A.S.L.1 Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy

Ugo A Merlo, PharmD

A.S.L.1 Valdese Hospital, Turin, Italy

Purpose. Toxicity may distress patients and cause delay or a discontinuance of scheduled chemotherapies. A key issue is to create a reporting system in order to assess toxicities and also evaluate treatments.

Methods. In the Oncology Unit 3000 intravenous chemotherapies are administered each year, mostly in the day hospital. In summer 2002, oncologists and pharmacists agreed to assess myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity of grades 3 and 4. Pharmacists designed a form and a database in order to collect toxicity data for every patient. The oncologist records type and grade of toxicity (according to the NCI CTC) on the patient chart before chemotherapy commences. During the validation of computerized prescriptions the pharmacist collects data about possible toxicities of every grade.

Results. From August-October 2002, 675 chemotherapies were administered. Seventy-two patients developed GI toxicity at various grades, nine of grade 3 and two of grade 4. Regimens with fluorouracil, carboplatin, cisplatin and oxaliplatin were highly involved in GI toxicity. Eighty-seven patients developed myelosuppression, two of grade 3 and 33 of grade 4. Regimens with epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, cisplatin and carboplatin were highly involved in myelosuppression. After the first report, oncologists and pharmacists decided to stop collecting data in order to improve the reporting system and to plan regular meetings.

Conclusions. A reliable reporting system is a valuable tool for oncologists to manage toxicity and to evaluate chemotherapy regimens. Assessing chemotherapy toxicity is a good opportunity for pharmacists to take part in preventing toxicity and reducing patient’s discomfort.

Key Words: chemotherapy • gastrointestinal • myelo-suppression • toxicity

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 11, No. 2, 63-67 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/1078155205jp154oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement