SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Serrano-Fabiá, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jiménez-Torres, N. V.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Serrano-Fabiá, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jiménez-Torres, N. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Multidisciplinary system for detecting medication errors in antineoplastic chemotherapy

Amparo Serrano-Fabiá1*, Asunción Albert-Marí2, Daniel Almenar-Cubells3, and N. Víctor Jiménez-Torres4

1 Hospital Manacor
2 Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset and Universidad de Valencia
3 Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset
4 Hospital Manacor and Universidad de Valencia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: serrano_ampfab{at}gva.es.


   Abstract

Objective. To analyze medication errors (MEs) in a multidisciplinary system with a Computerized Pharmacotherapy Process (CPP) in cancer patients.

Design. A longitudinal, prospective 2-year (January 2003 –to December 2004) cohort study was made in adult patients administered antineoplastic treatment in Services of Oncology and Haematology. MEs were identified by double cross-validation of each stage of the pharmacotherapeutic process (prescription, preparation, dispensing, administration, and follow-up) carried out by the multidisciplinary team (physician, pharmacist, nurse) with CPP assistance.

Variables. Number of MEs per 1000 patient-days, percentage according to the stage of the pharmacotherapeutic process and the severity of intercepted ME (scored from 1 = no damage to the patient, to 5 = patient death).

Results. A total of 1311 patients were receiving treatment, and MEs were identified in 225. Out of a total of 13,158 patient-days, 276 MEs were detected, equivalent to 20.9 MEs per 1000 patient-days; of these, 16.8 MEs per 1000 patient-days (80%) were intercepted and did not affect any patient.

The detected ME distribution according to pharmacotherapeutic stage was: prescription 75.7%, preparation 21.0%, dispensing 1.8%, administration 1.1%, and follow-up 0.4%. ME distribution according to severity was: grade 1 : 15.9%, grade 2 : 49.6%, grade 3 : 33.7%, grade 4 : 0.7%, and grade 5 : 0%.

The system intercepted 98.9% of all MEs with severity ≥3 (MEs with a potential for causing patient damage).

Conclusions. The multidisciplinary system with a well-established CPP detects 20.9 MEs per 1000 patient-days and intercepts 98.8% of all MEs with a potential for causing patient damage.

First published on July 17, 2009
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice 2009, doi:10.1177/1078155209340482


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement