SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howell, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gill, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howell, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gill, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Pharmacokinetics of a granisetron transdermal system for the treatment of chemotherapy- induced nausea and vomiting

Julian Howell1*, Jean Smeets2, Henk-Jan Drenth2, and David Gill1

1 Clinical Development, ProStrakan Ltd, Galashiels, UK
2 LAP&P Consultants BV, Leiden, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

Objective. To determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of granisetron transdermal formulation and examine its possible relationship with age, gender, and renal function.

Methods. This article describes a Phase I PK study and a post hoc pooled population PK analysis. The Phase I study was a randomized, cross-over study that assessed PK parameters of three granisetron patch sizes and oral granisetron. The pooled population PK analysis included data from three trials in healthy subjects (n = 48) and from Phase II and III studies in patients with cancer (n = 793). The population PK model was used to investigate granisetron exposure and its possible relationship with age, gender, and renal function.

Results. Following oral dosing, plasma granisetron concentration was quantifiable at 1 h, and maximal mean concentration (4.7 ng/mL) was reached 2 h after administration. With transdermal application, maximal concentration was reached 48 h post-application; t1/2 was 36 h. With oral dosing, overall exposure after 5 days was 306 ng/mL·h, and Cavg 2.6 ng/mL. This corresponded to an AUC0–{infty} for the 52 cm2 patch of 420 ng/mL·h and Cavg 2.2 ng/mL over 6 days. Clearance was not affected by age, gender, weight, or renal function.

Conclusion. The 52 cm2 granisetron patch achieves a similar exposure to that of a 2 mg oral dose and provides continuous delivery of granisetron over 6 days. The patch may have utility in treating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting where prolonged drug delivery is advantageous. No dose adjustments would be needed based on age or renal function.

Key Words: chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV); dose; antiemetic; transdermal; granisetron; pharmacokinetics

First published on March 20, 2009
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice 2009, doi:10.1177/1078155209104063


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement