SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Lemos, M. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by de Lemos, M. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Role of dimethylsulfoxide for management of chemotherapy extravasation

Mário L de Lemos, PharmD, MRPharmS

Provincial Drug Information Coordinator, Provincial Systemic Therapy Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency

Extravasation of anthracyclines is a rare complication that can lead to severe tissue necrosis and ulceration. With conservative measures (e.g., limb elevation, cooling), ulceration may develop in 28% of patients. Topical dimethylsulfoxide is commonly suggested as an antidote. However, there are inconsistent and sometimes conflicting animal data on its efficacy and safety. Ovid Medline (1966 to April 2004) was searched using the medical subject headings of ‘Dimethyl Sulfoxide’ and ‘Extravasation of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Materials’, and limited to English language and human articles. There have been no controlled trials on dimethylsulfoxide comparing its efficacy with cooling alone. Of a total of 147 patients, ulceration was uncommon after anthracycline extravasation when patients were managed with dimethylsulfoxide with or without cooling. Dimethylsulfoxide was well tolerated, with the most common toxicities being early mild reversible burning sensation, blistering, followed later by itch, erythema and superficial scaling. Dimethylsulfoxide is probably effective in preventing ulceration in patients who may not respond to cooling alone. When applied appropriately, dimethylsulfoxide seems well tolerated, with self-limiting local irritation to be the most common adverse effect. Hence, it is reasonable to consider topical dimethylsulfoxide 99% solution when managing extravasation of anthracyclines and mitomycin.

Key Words: anthracycline • chemotherapy • dimethylsulfoxide • extravasation • mitomycin

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 10, No. 4, 197-200 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/1078155204jp137oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




Advertisement