SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilbar, P. J
Right arrow Articles by Ridge, A. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gilbar, P. J
Right arrow Articles by Ridge, A. M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

History of opioid allergy: what significance?

Peter J Gilbar, BPharm, MPallC, FISOPP, FSHP

Department of Pharmacy, Toowoomba Health Services, PMB 2, Toowoomba, Australia

Alison M Ridge, BPharm

Department of Pharmacy, Toowoomba Health Services, PMB 2, Toowoomba, Australia

Objective. To assess how health professionals would manage a patient’s pain when the patient is labelled as allergic to opioid analgesics.

Methods. A clinical case scenario, describing a patient obviously requiring opioid pain management but reporting a morphine allergy, was designed and pretested. This was distributed to medical (students, interns/residents, registrars, consultants) and nursing staff of Toowoomba Health Service District. All staff had some experience in pain management, though this varied widely. Respondents were asked to review the history and briefly comment on how the patient’s pain should be managed.

Results. Overall response rate was 46%. Doctors returned 47% (39/83) of scenarios, with 53% requesting further information on the nature of the allergy before using opioids. Nurses response rate was 45.2% (42/93), with only 21.4% requesting more information. Eighty three per cent (15/18) of doctors and 60% (20/33) of nurses, who didn’t query the nature of the morphine allergy, recommended opioid medication. No one specifically suggested using structurally dissimilar opioids to morphine if an allergy really existed.

Conclusion. Many health care staff either missed or ignored the allergy or assumed it was really an adverse effect and not significant, potentially placing the patient at risk of serious consequences, including anaphylaxis. Despite the low incidence of true opioid allergy, health professionals must fully investigate purported allergies to determine their validity. Patients should never be administered medications until their likelihood of experiencing a true allergy is determined.

Key Words: opioid allergy • morphine • allergy • scenario

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 10, No. 3, 183-186 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/1078155204jp131oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement