Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gilbar, P. J
Right arrow Articles by Ridge, A. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gilbar, P. J
Right arrow Articles by Ridge, A. M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 10, No. 3, 177-182 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/1078155204jp132oa

Inappropriate labelling of patients as opioid allergic

Peter J Gilbar, BPharm, MPallC, FISOPP, FSHP

Department of Pharmacy, Toowoomba Health Services, PMB 2, Toowoomba, Australia

Alison M Ridge, BPharm

Department of Pharmacy, Toowoomba Health Services, PMB 2, Toowoomba, Australia

Objectives. To investigate the incidence of patients being inappropriately labelled as allergic to opioid medications and to assess the effect that this label may have had on the subsequent prescribing of opioids.

Methods. A study was conducted on patients admitted to Toowoomba Hospital over a three month period as to their perceived opioid allergy status. In addition to medication history interview, pharmacists recorded data on any claimed drug allergy attributed to opioid medications. Events were classified depending on the probability of the event being an allergic or immunological drug reaction. Medical records and medication charts of identified patients were checked to determine if allergy status had any effect on opioid prescribing.

Results. Thirty patients reported an opioid allergy. Morphine and codeine were most commonly implicated, with nausea and vomiting the most likely adverse events. Six patients were classified as high probability of allergic reaction, although anaphylaxis wasn’t reported. Most allergy documentation was incomplete, with the nature of reaction seldom recorded. Despite a ‘supposed’ opioid allergy, 70% of patients were prescribed subsequent opioids. Of the six patients in the high probability group, four were prescribed opioids. Three received alternate opioids without incident, while nurses refused to administer the same previously implicated drug to the fourth patient.

Conclusion. Opioid prescribing did not appear to be influenced by a reported allergy. Ignoring ‘real’ allergies, however rare, may put patients at risk of severe consequences. Staff must be educated regarding the importance of recording accurately and thoroughly the specifics of patients’ medication allergies and its importance in future safe prescribing.

Key Words: opioid allergy • anaphylaxis • labelled • prescribing


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?