SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peschke, M.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Peschke, M.
Right arrow Articles by Meier, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cytogenetic monitoring of pharmaceutical staff working with cytostatic drug preparations: A 5-year follow-up

Michael Peschke

Dienst der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg, Alter Steinweg 4, D-20459 Hamburg

Sibylle Nagel

Dienst der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg, Alter Steinweg 4, D-20459 Hamburg

Frank Haamann

Dienst der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg, Alter Steinweg 4, D-20459 Hamburg

Simone Melzer

Allg. Krankenhauses Harburg, Eissendorfer Pferdeweg 52, D-21075 Hamburg, Germany

Klaus Meier

Allg. Krankenhauses Harburg, Eissendorfer Pferdeweg 52, D-21075 Hamburg, Germany

Introduction. Cytostatic drug preparation in hos pital pharmacies leads to a concentration of expo sure on a few people and requires considerable protective measures.

Methods. To prove the efficiency of those standards, 45 people who routinely prepare cyto static drugs were monitored with cytogenetic tests, Micronucleus-rate (MN), and Sister Chroma tid Exchange-rate (SCE), once a year over a period up to 5 years. All participants of the study received a physical examination before they began prepar ing cytostatic drugs. Baseline MN and SCE were performed at the time. Individual comparisons for the tests between pre- and post-exposure, and a comparison between an exposed and an unex posed group were then performed.

Results. During the 5-year follow-up there were no hints of genotoxic effects as a result of handling cytostatic drugs.

Conclusion. Thus, it appeared that the safety precautions employed at this Institute were ade quate.

Key Words: Sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) • micronucleus (MN) • cytostatic drugs; cytogenetic monitoring • pharmaceutical staff.

Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 1, No. 1, 33-39 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/107815529500100104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement